ποΈ AgencyGrid: Open AI Societal Infrastructure
In a society of agents or the Internet of Agents, billions of autonomous entities interact, collaborate, and compete across open, unbounded environments. Success here depends not only on what individual agents can do, but on how they are organized, coordinated, and governed. Without clear agency, the structures of roles, relationships, authority, and interaction rules - large-scale cooperation breaks down, trust erodes, and resilience falters.
AgencyGrid provides the formal mechanism for these open systems:
- Defining roles and verifying capabilities.
- Aligning incentives and structuring negotiations.
- Handling escalation and conflict resolution.
- Establishing adaptable governance.
It bridges the gap between self-organizing autonomy and structured collaboration, enabling agents to form stable societies, negotiate shared goals, and evolve collective intelligence. By embedding agency as a first-class construct, AgencyGrid transforms the Internet of Agents from a loose network of autonomous nodes into a coherent, adaptive civilization of machines.
π Beyond the Individual Agent
Agency extends beyond the capabilities and decision-making of individual agents to include the societal dimension of coordination and control.
This broader view recognizes that effective MAS design requires frameworks where:
- Coordination mechanisms, global requirements, and system-wide behaviors are not solely embedded within individual agents,
- but can also be defined and managed at the societal, organizational, or infrastructural level.
Systems that rely on a predefined agent type or class risk becoming closed and inflexible, as they exclude agents with different coordination models or behavioral patterns.
True agency therefore embraces:
- Heterogeneity β supporting diverse kinds of agents.
- Interoperability β enabling communication and collaboration across boundaries.
- Shared Governance β ensuring order without sacrificing autonomy.
β¨ This allows diverse agents to operate and collaborate within a common societal framework.
Effective multi-agent design requires frameworks where:
- Coordination, global requirements, and system behaviors are not hard-coded inside agents.
- Institutions, protocols, and organizational structures manage interaction at the societal or infrastructural level.
- Heterogeneity and interoperability are embraced, allowing diverse agents to collaborate within a common framework.
An Agency can be understood as an entity distinct from the agents within it. It has its own goals, processes, and structure (roles, responsibilities, and activities), but it cannot act directly. Instead, agents occupy these roles and carry out its functions. This creates a mutual dependency: the agency provides the framework for coordinated action, while the agents provide the operational capacity to realize its aims.
βοΈ Agencies as Active Systems
Agencies operate within multi-agent or massive multi-agent environments. Like organizations in systems thinking, their success depends not just on the parts but on how those parts work together. Agencies:
- Take in resources and use them efficiently to produce results.
- Intentionally structure interactions to achieve shared global goals.
- Define desired outcomes externally, independent of individual agentsβ inner design or goals.
This ensures global outcomes without reducing the autonomy of agents.
ποΈ Inspiration from Human Societies
Multi-agent agencies draw inspiration from human institutions by:
- Defining roles, responsibilities, and permissions.
- Structuring both coordination mechanisms (plans, workflows, goals) and institutional mechanisms (rules, norms, protocols).
- Balancing agent-centric approaches (where coordination is implicit inside each agent) with agency-centric approaches (where the societal framework is explicit and referenceable).
β¨ AgencyGrid turns agency into programmable societal infrastructure, enabling billions of agents to interact through structured coordination, trust, and adaptability.
A unified backend for orchestrating roles, workflows, policies, tasks, and infrastructure for AI-driven organizations. Modular, policy-aware, and designed for secure, scalable, and autonomous operations in modern cloud-native environments.
π§ Project Status: Alpha
Not production-ready. See Project Status for details.
π Contents
- Org Registry
- Org Modules
- Org Roles
- Org Association System
- Org Constraints Executor
- Org Job Contracts
- Org Job Processing
- Org Tasks DB
- Org Functions Tool
- Org Resources
- Org Gateway
π Links
- π Vision Paper
- π Documentation
- π» GitHub
π Architecture Diagrams
- π‘ Org Constraints System
- πͺ Org Gateway
- π Org JobβContract Mapping System
- β Org Job Processing System
- π§ Org Workflow Executor
- π Orgs Registry
- π Org Deployer
- π₯ Org Roles System
- π Org Tasks Database
π Highlights
π§© Modular Organization Lifecycle
- π’ Define and provision organizations via declarative metadata
- π Automate creation of org-specific resources and service deployments
- π Register, search, and manage orgs via GraphQL and REST APIs
- βοΈ Enable dynamic org-level autoscaling and resource enforcement
π Secure Role and Access Management
- π§βπ€βπ§ Associate users or agents with roles, job spaces, and function access
- β Enforce access control using constraint-based DSLs & Policies
- π Dynamically resolve permissions during request lifecycle
- π Track all associations, constraints, and contracts in DB
π Workflow-Driven Execution Engine
- π§ Execute modular workflows using tools, functions, and DAGs
- π Route jobs to internal agents based on org-specific logic
- πͺ’ Delegate node-level execution via APIs or local executors
- π¦ Queue-based execution and WebSocket updates
π Comprehensive Governance & Observability
- π‘ Enforce constraint checks before tool/function invocation
- π Monitor org usage, apply quotas, and trigger autoscaling
- π¬ Message validation and execution via NATS or Redis queues
- π Fully observable with logs, metrics, and live execution traces
π¦ Use Cases
Use Case | What It Solves |
---|---|
Multi-Org Deployment Management | Automates provisioning, scaling, and isolation of organizations |
Role-Based Access & Policy Control | Enforces contract-driven access and validation across systems |
Workflow Orchestration | DAG-based execution across tools, agents, and microservices |
Internal Function & Tool Execution | Local or remote invocation of approved code with audit logging |
Constraint-Driven Job Assignment | Matches tasks to agents based on pre-evaluation logic |
π§© Integrations
Component | Purpose |
---|---|
MongoDB | Registry storage for roles, functions, contracts, jobs, workflows |
Redis | Event queue, execution buffer, and constraint caching |
NATS | Message transport for real-time job delegation |
Flask + GraphQL | REST and query interface for APIs and frontend orchestration |
Kubernetes | Dynamic org provisioning and autoscaler management |
π§ Subsystems and Roles
Subsystem | Description |
---|---|
org_registry |
Manages org metadata, tags, structure (MongoDB + GraphQL) |
org_deployer |
Provisions new orgs and deploys scoped services via Kubernetes |
org_autoscaler |
Monitors usage and triggers quota enforcement / scaling decisions |
org_resources |
Governs org quotas, replica counts, and resource constraints |
roles_system |
Assigns subjects to roles/groups with fine-grained policy enforcement |
constraints_checker |
Validates request constraints using dynamic DSLs before execution |
contracts-generator |
Generates and maps job-specific contracts and policy rules |
tools_executor |
Manages registration and runtime execution of tools (binary/Python) |
dsl_proxy |
Executes DSL-based workflows and resolves dynamic node-based execution |
assignment-system |
Assigns tasks/jobs to appropriate agents or workers |
job-internal-processor |
Handles job lifecycle, agent resolution, and contract enforcement |
task_system |
Orchestrates full task pipelines and external events |
tasks_db |
Stores persistent state of tasks and sub-task executions |
task-internal-assigner |
Resolves assignments and dispatches to correct executors |
gateway |
API gateway for policy enforcement and routing validation |
π‘ Why Use This?
Problem | Our Solution |
---|---|
πΉ Fragmented org, role, and policy systems | Unified control layer for access, validation, and execution |
πΉ Manual org provisioning and scaling | Automated provisioning + dynamic autoscaler per org |
πΉ Workflow sprawl and uncontrolled function use | DSL-governed workflows with role-based execution rights |
πΉ Inefficient job allocation across agents | Constraint-evaluated assignment engine with queue fallback |
πΉ Lack of observability into function/tool execution | WebSocket and Redis tracking for every execution lifecycle |
Project Status π§
β οΈ Development Status
The project is nearing full completion of version 1.0.0, with minor updates & optimization still being delivered.β οΈ Alpha Release
Early access version. Use for testing only. Breaking changes may occur.π§ͺ Testing Phase
Features are under active validation. Expect occasional issues and ongoing refinements.β Not Production-Ready
We do not recommend using this in production (or relying on it) right now.π Compatibility
APIs, schemas, and configuration may change without notice.π¬ Feedback Welcome
Early feedback helps us stabilize future releases.
π’ Communications
- π§ Email: community@opencyberspace.org
- π¬ Discord: OpenCyberspace
- π¦ X (Twitter): @opencyberspace
π€ Join Us!
This project is community-driven. Theory, Protocol, implementations - All contributions are welcome.
Get Involved
- π¬ Join our Discord
- π§ Email us: community@opencyberspace.org